Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
61. Characters kept by EVE forever? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nana Skalski wrote: Steve posting is not a rare sight on these forums. Ok in fairness yes Steve does post a bit Specifically in the last week Steve Ronuken - 9 posts Aryth - Nil, Last post 2 months ago Mr Hyde113 - Nil, Last post 3 months ag...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2016.12.01 10:33:25
|
62. Watch Lists in High Sec - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
DioKahn wrote: I get as much value from using this forum as I do from Youtube comments. Bye. If people don't like your idea of "Please bring back my free intel" and you spit the dummy. Maybe Merc work is not for you.
- by Mark Marconi - at 2016.12.01 06:07:39
|
63. Characters kept by EVE forever? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steve Ronuken wrote: Paranoid Loyd wrote: AFAIK they have only purged the DB once, they removed the trial account names. As alphas are more or less trial accounts they would probably be purged if necessary. They didn't purge the charact...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2016.12.01 05:38:30
|
64. Most fun/profitable career path. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The most profitable career in EvE is the one you enjoy doing the most. If looking at asteroids for hours while you relax is your thing then thats it. Blapping someone else and stealing their stuff tickles you then thats it. After all PI is pro...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2016.12.01 05:36:09
|
65. Making friends in Eve Online - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
The EvE dictionary defines friend as: noun noun: friend; plural noun: friends; noun: Friend; plural noun: Friends 1.a person with whom one has a bond of mutual affection, typically one exclusive of sexual or family relations who has not stabbed...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2016.11.30 03:44:59
|
66. Free, yeah right - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tristan Valentina wrote: Well since you cant really quit anymore, can I have your stuff and biomass? Fly safe! EvE is now just like Hotel California.
- by Mark Marconi - at 2016.11.28 20:00:55
|
67. War for Attackers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jennifer Starblaze wrote: Thanks for making me laugh with that statement about corp tax though. Gonna keep that one in mind. "Lower corp taxes are not a benefit, because you don-Št have lower taxes as soon as you leave the corp," - ROFL. P...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2016.11.28 19:55:37
|
68. War for Attackers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Remiel Pollard wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: Remiel Pollard wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: And there you go, you just answered your own question as to why not because other forms of PvP exist and are just as valid as shooting someone. There ...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2016.11.28 10:17:29
|
69. War for Attackers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Remiel Pollard wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: And there you go, you just answered your own question as to why not because other forms of PvP exist and are just as valid as shooting someone. There for denying someone combat is a valid form of Pv...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2016.11.28 10:10:02
|
70. War for Attackers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Remiel Pollard wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: Remiel Pollard wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: Remiel Pollard wrote: Corporations need to become commitments that players have to make. Why? Besides as a bonus to attackers in wardecs, WHY? ...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2016.11.28 09:45:21
|
71. War for Attackers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Remiel Pollard wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: Remiel Pollard wrote: Corporations need to become commitments that players have to make. Why? Besides as a bonus to attackers in wardecs, WHY? In a game where virtually every mechanic is des...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2016.11.28 09:35:16
|
72. Already Uninstalled, I hope you dont read this - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Engage You wrote: i didnt uninstall but i havent subbed .. game is just too dull especially the community Try the World of Tanks Community. That is free to complain as well.
- by Mark Marconi - at 2016.11.28 04:20:18
|
73. War for Attackers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Neuntausend wrote: @Mark Marconi: I disagree that having a tax above 0 is a risk. If you merely "risk" not gaining a benefit you wouldn't normally get, that's not a risk. But I'm not arguing anyway that people should not be allowed to just aba...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2016.11.28 04:05:28
|
74. War for Attackers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Neuntausend wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: What benefit do you automatically get? Let me ask the other way around - why do people make corps, if they allegedly don't get anything out of it and only risk getting murdered by Marmite everytime th...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2016.11.28 03:12:36
|
75. War for Attackers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Neuntausend wrote: And finally on the topic of corps having to be able to defend themselves: I agree with that. You can play the game perfectly fine without a corp and by extension without war. You can invite your friends to a mailing list, yo...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2016.11.28 02:21:06
|
76. War for Attackers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Remiel Pollard wrote: Corporations need to become commitments that players have to make. Why? Besides as a bonus to attackers in wardecs, WHY?
- by Mark Marconi - at 2016.11.28 01:20:47
|
77. War for Attackers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ralph King-Griffin wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: Ralph King-Griffin wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: My biggest beef with the Wardec system as it stands is that it is the opposite of risk vs reward. It is cheaper to wardec a small corp than it ...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2016.11.28 00:21:54
|
78. War for Attackers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ralph King-Griffin wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: My biggest beef with the Wardec system as it stands is that it is the opposite of risk vs reward. It is cheaper to wardec a small corp than it is to wardec a large one. They need to balance it o...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2016.11.27 22:55:17
|
79. War for Attackers - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
My biggest beef with the Wardec system as it stands is that it is the opposite of risk vs reward. It is cheaper to wardec a small corp than it is to wardec a large one. They need to balance it out so the cost is based on your corps size vs the op...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2016.11.27 22:08:21
|
80. Dear CCP, Re: Hulk fitting - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This is because the hulk is designed to have little tank. It goes Hulk no tank Mack little tank Skiff Massive tank The problem is easy to fix, either be greedy and have no tank or compromise a bit and have a tank the size of a battle ship. Afte...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2016.11.27 19:59:09
|
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |